In the interest of full disclosure, I’m a lifelong liberal. Not just a little bit liberal – very liberal. Like, tree-hugging socialist progressive grass-roots liberal. And I’m not making an argument for or against any presidential candidate. At this point, they all fucking suck.
The one and only point of this post is to illustrate trends in American heavy metal, and their relation to the US political climate. I will also illustrate that the same pattern holds true in Great Britain. Between the two countries, there’s been (for lack of a better word) a stranglehold on major movements in heavy metal history. And any other major movements or players in the global metal scene are subject to the same (or a very similar) pattern.
An important note here – I’m not implying causation. I’m implying correlation. Major trends in American extreme/underground metal have ALWAYS happened during conservative republican presidential terms. Likewise (with the exception of hair metal) all major “mainstream” trends in American heavy metal have happened during liberal (to moderate) democratic presidential terms.
I’m actually not the first person to notice this. I had been thinking about how there had been nothing but regurgitated crap (as far as new metal bands are concerned) coming out of the United States lately. Then it hit me, and I immediately did a google search to make sure nobody had already written an article on the subject. Lo and behold, some anonymous writer for a conservative website had noticed the same trend.
Established bands are another thing altogether, they’re not going to create a second wave of Thrash or Death metal with the same impact as the original. We’re in the middle of a “metal-bubble” right now (the market is absolutely saturated with good metal from established acts), and within the next few years it’s going to burst no matter what – but that’s another story for another day.
American Metal
In the United States, there really wasn’t much to speak of as far as original, ground breaking heavy metal besides a couple of bandwagon bands until the rise of thrash. From about 1970-1981 Americans might have consumed a good deal of metal, but most of the major artists were Brits. Sabbath, Motorhead, Deep Purple – Brits. Judas Priest? English. Iron Maiden? You get the idea.
Then something happened. Ronald Reagan won the Presidency of the United States, and ushered in a conservative era that lasted over a decade. Reagan was sworn into office in January of 1981. In that same year Anthrax, Dark Angel (not to be confused with Death Angel), Metallica, Pantera, and Slayer were formed. The following years saw Death Angel, Death, Megadeth, Testament, Atheist, GWAR, Morbid Angel, Nuclear Assault, Obituary, etc. Literally within a 3-4 year period you’ve got the seeds for two major movements/splits in heavy metal, not to mention about 2/3 of the base of what we now refer to as extreme metal. And it wasn’t just metal – VICE magazine just released an article discussing why Reagan was the best thing to happen to punk music.
I’m not sure if I can stress how big of a deal this is.The seeds for America’s permanent stamp on heavy metal history were planted and germinated during a very conservative time in the American political climate. During Reagan’s first term, the bands known as “the big four” all formed, and by the end of the second term Thrash had taken the world by storm. Metallica became the most successful metal band in the world, and Death metal was blossoming.
By the beginning of George Bush’s (senior) term in 1989, Death Metal had already overtaken Thrash. Obituary, Cannibal Corpse, Death, Deicide, Morbid Angel – Death metal was on the rise until it peaked out and stagnated around 1992-1993. Bill Clinton (Democrat) took office in January of 1993.
From 1993-2000, there were also major movements in metal that contributed to the culture as a whole metal pretty much sucked. And the overall political atmosphere of the United States was predominantly liberal/democrat. Remember Grunge? Clinton era. Nu Metal? Clinton. Slayer’s attempt at nu-metal? Clinton era. Metallica cuts their hair, goes “alt-rock”, and takes photos tongue kissing each other? Clinton era. Limp Bizkit and Linkin Park? Thanks a lot, Democrats.
Enter 2000, a democrat wins but is rick-rolled out of office by a republican. Suddenly, there’s a resurgence in metal. A lot of players in what is commonly referred to as the “New Wave of American Metal” start picking up and getting more attention and rotation. Killswitch Engage, Lamb of God, Shadows Fall, and Chimaira all released albums – essentially a mutated Thrash renaissance. Also of note, Devourment started getting big. Slam was born, and real brutal death metal started taking off. Tech Death flourished. Ozzfest, admittedly around since the Clinton era, took off and saw it’s highest attendance ever.
2008, Obama wins. Ozzfest stops touring the US. Metalcore devolved into a bad caricature of itself, and Deathcore (a death metal influenced offshoot of metalcore) came to prominence. Blackgaze took off. You get the idea.
I’m not here to debate whether metalcore/deathcore/blackgaze are good or bad, I’m talking about global musical impact. There are Thrash bands, Death Metal bands, and Black metal bands all over the planet. Beyond the United States and Great Britain, there aren’t very many deathcore or metalcore bands. Deathcore has gotten to the point where quintessential founding bands of the genre like The Acacia Strain refuse to be associated with the term any more. And it seems like, while the rest of the world might not mind listening to these bands – by and large they don’t replicate these styles.
Global Confirmation of the Trend
Black Sabbath released their debut album under a conservative Prime Minister (in fact, he was from a political party literally called “the conservative party”). The NWOBHM occurred during the reign of the Conservative Party in Britain (in fact, the party held sway for 57% of the 20th century in Britain). Grindcore as a genre germinated almost exclusively under conservative control.
In the early 90’s, Black Metal came to the attention of the entire world through a scene that formed, in large part, as a cultural response to the incredible grip conservatives had on the country.
Sepultura? Rose on the tail end of an authoritarian conservative regime in Brazil. Behemoth? Yeah, Poland is still wicked conservative.
And this isn’t to say that there isn’t good metal made by bands during liberal regimes. It’s saying I haven’t seen a legitimate artistic movement within American heavy metal that’s permanently changed the face of metal during a liberal regime. There are probably always going to be dark-horse bands like Pantera that carry the flag for decent metal – I’m just saying as of right now they seem to be the exception, not the rule.
(Clinton fans, don’t get your panties in a bunch. Hillary Clinton is still more conservative than any honest democrat should be comfortable with. I’m sure there will be plenty of angry music made if she’s elected. I’m just saying it’ll be shitty mainstream stuff that’s overtly politically correct)
Conclusion
If Trump wins, America’s going to start pumping out the fucking jams. The “Metal Bubble” we’re currently experiencing will probably pop immediately following his presidential term (4-8 years, depending on how generous you are. Remember, we as a country elected George W. Bush after he stole the election the first time, so don’t give American voters too much credit). We might even finally get another “real” movement in extreme metal.
If Hillary Clinton wins, subsequent movements in heavy metal will all be mainstream in nature, and the trend of whiny millennial hipsters taking over the American metal scene will continue. Metal concerts will continue to be referred to as people’s “safe spaces”, and former leaders in the metal scene like Phil Anselmo will continue to be demonized. Metal will continue down the track it’s on, and become a bad parody of itself.
- If you’re voting for Trump (and listen to metal), this is probably another vindication of your choice to vote for him. Good for you.
- If you’re voting for Clinton (and listen to metal), consider it a silver lining for if she loses. As of right now, it’s not looking great.
Whoever wins, we’re all fucked. We’re literally watching the crumbling decay of an empire. It’s unavoidable at this point. I just want there to be a decent soundtrack.
October 31, 2016 at 12:45 pm
Reblogged this on Kerberos616.
LikeLike
November 2, 2016 at 12:46 pm
Very interesting. I’m voting for Jill Stein. What would happen to metal if my some miracle, she gets elected? On anther note, I have always contended that the 80s was the golden age of heavy metal. I wrote a book about it called “Rock And Roll Children.” One thing metalheads had to contend with back then was the tide of intolerance from ultra conservatives in America. Metalheads were pretty much discriminated against in that decade and that helped to usher in the metal movements in that decade.
LikeLike
November 2, 2016 at 2:39 pm
It would be quite the miracle – I think she’s more of a realist than that. She’s running to get federal funding for the green party. I think it’s more likely that Hillary will be removed and Bernie Sanders will become the de-facto nominee of the Democratic Party – and the chances of that are about the same as a snowball’s chance in hell. If we were able, by some miracle, to get a liberal into office – the tone in metal would (if the pattern is correct, and I think it is) continue to trend toawrds more of the “artsy” metal (and the mainstream stuff that’s really nothing but puffed up hard rock). Metal will also continue on it’s current trek of becoming socially acceptable – which I’m not a huge fan of.
LikeLiked by 1 person
November 2, 2016 at 6:26 pm
She is more the realist and you have a point about metal becoming more artsy although I doubt it would ever become socially acceptable. The genre has its fair share of critics from the left as well as the right. Of course the more progressive metal bands could flourish at this point. Maybe Jon Oliva would get some sort of Savatage sounding band together.
LikeLike
May 19, 2018 at 8:25 am
at least you weren’t deluded enough to honestly think clinton would win, berniefan96. most good bands are pretty liberal if you have an ear for music. i prefer stuff that stays out of it myself.
LikeLike
May 19, 2018 at 10:07 am
Scarlett Johansson, I actively hoped Clinton wouldn’t win. I did (And still do) consider her the greater of two evils.
This isn’t an article for or against political bands, it’s talking about movements like thrash, death, and black metal.
I prefer bands that stay out of it myself. Guessing you’re a Pantera/5FDP guy.
LikeLike
May 19, 2018 at 8:27 am
damn i put the
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 19, 2018 at 8:31 am
crap on bernie not realizing he wasn’t enough of a hippie for you. if i hear lyrics going full commie i usually thumbs down them on pandora. i like the black dahlia murder, job for a cowboy, other bands that are good for their sound and not their politics.
LikeLike
May 19, 2018 at 10:30 am
Oh, you’re a core fan who uses Pandora.
LikeLike
June 3, 2019 at 4:47 pm
Interesting. I’m not a metal listener but got here via a rabbit hole about Pantera. Is there a follow up article to this yet?
LikeLike
June 3, 2019 at 5:22 pm
No, sadly I’ve been neglecting the site as of late. A follow up would be a good idea though, thank you!
LikeLike